Hi,
>>"Martin" == Martin Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Oh, I think this symlink idea should definitely be optional; and
>> only if the maintainer wants it so.
Martin> How can we keep the upstream docs consistent with themselves,
Martin> while keeping the whole Debian system consistent? The
Martin> changelog.gz symlink should handle this well.
I do not think you can mandate policy that covers all cases
here, we may have to do things on a case by case basis. Just leave
enough leeway in policy for multiple solutions to be legal.
Martin> If you have any better proposals, please come forward with
Martin> them now.
Ny proposal is to stop micromanagement and leave some things
for the maintainer to decide. As long as a changelog.gz entity
exists, the maintainer should be competent enough to determine what
goes in there. They know their package best.
manoj
--
Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. Voltaire
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
