>>>>> On Sat, 25 Apr 1998 02:41:06 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> said:
Branden> [1 <text/plain; us-ascii (8bit)>] Is this okay? Branden> 3 packages, A, B, and C. Branden> B depends on A. C depends on B. Branden> B has a symlink to a directory in A. C has a symlink to the Branden> same directory in A, rather than a symlink to the symlink in Branden> B which points to the directory in A. Branden> Lintian complains about this: E: xslibg: Branden> usr-doc-symlink-without-dependency xlib6g Branden> Is it okay to do this with a transitive dependency? I don't Branden> see why not; it reduces the number of symlinks that must be Branden> traversed to get to the final destination. Why not make C depend on B and A. Then the problem is solved. (with unallowed transitive dependencies) Dres -- @James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Blessed Be! @ http://www.dimensional.com/~dres | Linux is kewl! @"Argue for your limitations and sure enough, they're yours." Bach -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
