Bob Hilliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMHO it would be better to use debian-policy for all policy > related matters, but far too many developers feel they don't have time > to subscribe to debian-policy, but then complain bitterly that policy > was adopted without their input.
Probably because they're confusing debian-devel (which they have experience with) with debian-policy (which they do not). [Perhaps we should simply subscribe to debian-policy anyone who complains about missing out on the discussion... Or, perhaps we should change the recommendations on what lists developers should join.] I don't think that we'll gain anything by forcing all policy discussion onto debian-devel. Both are open, archived lists. Debian-devel should be reserved for more immediate discussions, in my opinion. Unfortunately, its charter is something of a catchall... -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
