-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Rob Tillotson wrote: > [...] Since this "emacs" does not follow the new packaging conventions for > emacsen, it is incorrect for new-emacsen packages to depend on "emacs" > as that will cause the installation to break. (Which is exactly what > the packaging system is supposed to prevent.)
Oh, I was told that when you upgrade, you are supposed to upgrade everything, and therefore it does not matter if, for example, installing libc6 in a bo system breaks the old emacs completely. Would not have been easier to keep the name "emacs" for emacs19, but allowing other packages also to provide "emacs"? This way dselect would upgrade emacs to the version in hamm, which in turn depends on emacsen-common, and everything would work. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNX+x2yqK7IlOjMLFAQHhZQP7B8nf9DAmkVYhCPS26RfAC5z422iMGxD8 aGI3kU2duAUEv1xtKhCirxcptFc4ejGm3jbQgQNPsJ+oBbwo6yY03UxeoE+SFc/7 37cAGjAzRocv+SL/iyhMB7Z07yq7rWO9BwYEfN5Mf88WvJSEjMDEK0S64Z0d38it vrzwSPE1h8s= =8i03 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
