[-devel dropped; moved to -policy] On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 11:11:19AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Finally, it would be very nice if the hierarchy was under > > /usr/share/texmf rather than /usr/lib/texmf since the texmf hierarchy > > was designed to be sharable this way ... and it will also make it much > > easier to make "installers" for things such as the TeX Live 3 CD-ROM > > we're just now issuing. > > We have to discuss this. What do others (debian-devel) say to this > point?
This IMO is a policy issue: FSSTND (/usr/lib/texmf/) or FHS (/usr/share/texmf)? Debian 2.0 isn't intended to be FHS compliant, but (as far as I know) there are no real objections against a maintainer switching a package from FSSTND to FHS locations. I don't think this should happen in the deep freeze though. So my opinion would be: move to /usr/share/texmf, but do so in slink. Ray -- LEADERSHIP A form of self-preservation exhibited by people with auto- destructive imaginations in order to ensure that when it comes to the crunch it'll be someone else's bones which go crack and not their own. - The Hipcrime Vocab by Chad C. Mulligan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
