Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lacking a formal process, I would still like to reasonable > sure that the change indeed is something to which there is no serious > objection; and that requires, I think, possibly an announcement on > Debian devel (stating the change, and requesting any objections to be > posted to the debian-policy list); and a two week waiting period for > objections to be presented.
Makes sense. So we kick each issue around on debian-policy until a consensus appears to have emerged, I then produce a diff showing what is going to be changed and publish it as a two week warning on debian-devel, with supporting argument summarised from debian-policy (where needed), and encouraging people to say why the change should not happen. Is that fair enough ? Cheers, Phil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
