>>>>> "R" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> Martin Oldfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Isn't the obvious generalization to divide configuration
>> questions into blocks, then specify a state machine to navigate
>> between blocks ?
R> Er, if you don't mind that you have a nondeterministic state
R> machine (for example: all possible states exist in parallel)
R> when you're describing the configuration for many machines.
Is this the right way to think about it ? After all, every individual
configuration must be deterministic, and if you conflate a whole bunch
of configurations into one uberconfig, then you have to think how
you're going to untangle them again. Do you have a concrete example in
mind ?
Cheers,
--
Martin Oldfield.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
