Darren Benham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 08-Aug-98 Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > I think that with the four volunteers that we have already, > > all of whom are seasoned veterans, the situation seems to be under > > control, and we can let the selection process be as informal as it is > > now. > More or less the way the Technical Committee comes to be when the constitution > get's ratified..??
The Technical Comittee has a much more important role than the policy maintainers. The former are arbitrators and the later are secretaries. Choosing policy maintainers on a volunteer basis is fine. The technical committee is chosen in a much more formal manner. You can read details at <http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~ian/debian-organisation.html>, section 6. Guy
