Hi,
>>"Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Actually, I am going to make a stand about our Hypocrisy;
>> anything that you have said also applies to Licenses. You want to
>> throw things like the FHS and others out of main, you have to throw
>> out the DFSG, the social contract, and GPL etc out as well
Joseph> I don't think they should be, any of them. I don't think the
Joseph> DFSG counts anyway since it's not a license. Licenses are
Joseph> not change-able for a reason. That's IP issues, not free
Joseph> software issues IMO. A standards document should be allowed
Joseph> to be unmodifyable, same with a license.
Joseph> Am I making any sense?
To me you are. And, I suppose, you would agree to creating a
verbatim section, and putting all these unmodifiable documents in
there?
manoj
--
"I'll rob that rich person and give it to some poor deserving
slob. That will *prove* I'm Robin Hood." Daffy Duck, Looney Tunes,
_Robin Hood Daffy_
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
