Looks good. The only changes I suggest are: > + If the issue raised is especially contentous, or is deemed to be > + suitable for review by the full set of developers, then four or more > + developers can call for a hold on the proposal, and move to send the > + proposal to the larger developer body as a General Resolution. *Note:* > + The constitution may have additional requirements for submitting a > + General Resolution, for example, a minimum number of seconders, etc.
Note that technical issues may not be decided on by a General Resolution. Section 3.1 seems at odd with 3.3.1 and 3.3.2. 3.3.1 deals with technical, 3.3.2 deals with non-technical, so 3.3 deals with? I think you should remove the second two paragraphs from 3.3. > 3.4. Using the Bug Tracking System If we set the maintainer of the debian-policy package to the mailing list itself, then we need only mail the BTS. Guy
