How do I move to fix the spelling of the word 'document' in a Proposal? 'documentl' sounds like the Austrian diminutive word for document... :)
(Couldn't resist...) Nils. In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manoj Srivastava writes: >Hi, >>>"Ian" == Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Ian> How about instead allowing the change to be made immediately in the > Ian> development version, and retracted if anyone objects ? (I agree with > Ian> whoever suggested a 3 day objection period.) > > Sounds good to me How about: > > ====================================================================== > Spelling errors and typographical corrections > > The maintainers may make minor spelling and typographical > corrections in the documentl, provided it's clear that the changes do > not change the meaning of the document in any way, without going > through the proposal process > > In such a case, the maintainer must announce the intent to the > debian-policy mailing list. If there are any objections in the next > three days, the modification shall be retracted and the change > subject to the proposal process. If there are no objections, the > maintainer is free to go ahead and upload the corrected version. > ====================================================================== > > If there are no objections in the next three days, I shall > update the guidelines (and post a updated guidelines document here). > > manoj >-- > To enjoy freedom we have to control ourselves. -- Virginia Woolf >Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/> >Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
