[Manoj, why do you never CC the bug report? Annoying.] In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi >>> "Santiago" == Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Santiago> Would there be any objection to including the content of Santiago> debian-emacs-policy.gz into the policy itself, instead of Santiago> this reference?
> The idea is that while sub policy documents are being hammered > out, they remain in an xternal document under control of the authors > of the sub policy (genrally, these consist of the developers of the > packages affected). This allows for faster turnover, while still > giving the document the weight of policy. > Once the documents have stabilized, they are meant to be > brought under the aegis of the policy group. I object. The policy document should not have the specific technical information contained in a sub-policy, generally. However, it would be nice to have "officially blessed sub policies" which are mentioned at least in Policy. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
