In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is not the job of policy maintainers to take a bug to the > final acceptance. It is the responsibility of this mailing list, and > quite frankly, most people on this mailing list have been doing > little but talk when it come to policy.
> The bottel neck is not the policy maitainers -- there is not a > single accepted amendment that is hanging on the BTS. > You are pointing the finger in the wrong direction. [...] > Nothing is bveing over extended here that I can see. If > everyone on this mailing list wants to just hang out, doing nothing, > then yes, I think this whole idea of having a policy mailing list is > bigus. Shall we ask Ian to appoint a policy czar, who shall go off > and issue dictums from the high, now that we know the policy mailing > list has failed? No, it has not failed. Maybe I'm just impatient. You are right that I was wrong to point the finger at the policy maintainers. The fault is shouldered by the <debian-policy> participants. -- .....Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
