-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Why not the debian-doc package with the social contract, manifesto, et al? On 14-Dec-98 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Hi! > > I was planning to reread the constitution yesterday and discovered > it is not packaged. We clearly need to fix that. I suggested to > Adam Harris that he include it in developers-reference, and he > said he would rather see it in debian-policy. Personally I think > either is fine, although I slightly prefer developers-reference. > > So we decided to ask for your input on this.. > > Wichert. > > -- > ============================================================================== > This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <>< * * -------------------- * -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- ---------------* * Darren Benham * Version: 3.1 * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * GCS d+(-) s:+ a29 C++$ UL++>++++ P+++$ L++>++++* * KC7YAQ * E? W+++$ N+(-) o? K- w+++$(--) O M-- V- PS-- * * Debian Developer * PE++ Y++ PGP++ t+ 5 X R+ !tv b++++ DI+++ D++ * * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * G++>G+++ e h+ r* y+ * * -------------------- * ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ ---------------* ========================================================================= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBNnSMmrbps1lIfUYBAQEU2AQArOwA6eI5KanQAIsUO/vfemwtOC3WlNrz jJ7KCVjEfMZHcSceQmXhsUL1T5JiGBvjNedEU3GfQYcmrmN2wO71kPZzh2Tf39s9 42FoSuuN2hI07gzgI5rzoCNrAN20IFz91BfofVk8AqYXooHXn44R35ocXMCblWrK 1gbZqED9UQQ= =p1H8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
