>>>>> Richard Braakman writes: RB> I've read Brian's summary, but I still don't see the point of RB> this operator. It seems that what you want to accomplish can be RB> done just as easily with:
RB> Depends: hwarch-${Arch}, ${shlibs:Depends}
Thanks for pointing this out. I'll integrate it in the policy
proposal I'm writing.
--
Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/)
Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/)
