If we do this we must provide a good rational, because there's a lot we currently trust about the environment and this would be a change from existing practice.
[For example, take a look at how many scripts set IFS.] -- Raul Brock Rozen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about this, first incarnation mentioned by AJ: > > Scripts must not assume the environment is at all sensible, and should do > something to ensure that the environment that they need is present.
