On Thu, May 06, 1999 at 08:38:56AM -0600, Gordon Matzigkeit wrote: > BC> My two little pennies worth. I'm sort of against the "pure" > BC> concept, but only because main is _supposed_ to be pure, by it's > BC> own definition. > > I would be happy with either way. Here's my current vote: > > [1] TOSS THINGS INTO CONTRIB > [2] NEW PURE DISTRIBUTION > [ ] STATUS QUO
Ahh, first you blast me for deciding my vote on the issue which disagrees
with yours, and then you do the same. Am I not to think this
hypocritical of you? My vote, in case you actually decide to care what I
think (which is of course not required):
[ ] TOSS things into contrib arbitrarily
[ ] CREATE a new "pure" distribution
[ 2] REVIEW the social contract and DFSG and decide if we want to
change them at all and if so, how.
[ 1] LEAVE things as they are now
[ ] FURTHER discussion
I'm sick of arguing about it personally. If you want to do it, do it the
right way and put it to a vote. If you don't want to do that, I have
little more to say on the subject.
--
Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Knghtbrd unleashes a pair of double barreled snurf guns and covers
jesus with snurf darts
<jesus> meany :P
pgpy22gqQ5XyT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
