-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 06:57:23AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: > > Exactly. Shall I file a bug against all the POP3 servers to provide some > > virtual package, e.g. pop3-daemon, and then conflict with each other > > (through Conflicts: pop3-daemon )? > > Yes this would be a good idea. pop3-server would be better seeing as we > already have imap-server.
ACK. > > Crossposting to debian-devel so others can comment. > > I think you need to ask in debian-plicy for a new virtual package. (The > procedure described in virtual-packages.txt seems quite out of date.) Okay, I'm PGP signing this message and moving it to the Policy list. +++ So, I hereby propose that there is a new virtual package created, called "pop3-server". The packages that would provide this are ipopd, qpopper, cucipop and possibly some others. +++ - -- enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3ia Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBN1WHqYdGxXDOoJfVAQFAZQP/YBQ1JshtVOsqt2zvmvtOytLAkmEn4DBY gT2XurUjxttaneX5ZxATGyqZUz0653+okb8RgUuX/ZRBwkhS8nZsHLVVATvWygXJ Fwv7MASvZG9BsRCjnpuE23Y60Yz9BztFzeiIan0eAtHMQPViVred7PyQInuoG8C/ zB/v1NByeRY= =CXnV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
