On Mon, 14 Jun 1999 at 18:36, Jim Lynch wrote about "Re: Editor and...":
> Brock Rozen wrote: > > I didn't see support for pico in this -- thus, I'm against this proposal > > until sensible-editor has pico support. (If I'm mistaken,and it does have > > pico support, then I will second this proposal). > > pico is non-free, so I see no reason to hinge a decision on whether something > in debian supports something thats non-free. To clear up any confusion, the Pine (as such, pico; I believe) license has changed and that might make it eligible to be taken out of "non-free". Some people might remember the message I posted a few weeks ago regarding my discussion with the Pine developers. This might be as a result of that. -- Brock Rozen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director of Technical Services (410) 602-1350 Project Genesis http://www.torah.org/
