On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 00:29:29 +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On the /usr/share/doc vs. /usr/doc issue....
AOL! > I think that with a change as large as this, people must expect > inconsistencies if they perform partial upgrades/downgrades. We avoid these inconsistencies where reasonably possible, but users should be aware that complete upgrades/downgrades, in particular between releases, are what has our attention. On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 16:57:35 -0700, Joey Hess wrote: > Personally, I am opposed to the idea because it ignores the entire partial > upgrades question. But I can be overridden. I for one would much rather have limited problems for those who upgrade only partially than solutions that involve modifications to the core package management tools simply because a couple of preffered locations have changed. Ray -- Obsig: developing a new sig
