Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A nit pick: the policy update proposal does not have the
> weight of policy. It is merely a convention, or guidelines.
Yes, very good thing to keep in mind.
> If the issue raised is especially contentious, or is deemed to be
> suitable for review by the full set of developers, then four or more
> developers can call for a hold on the proposal, and move to send the
> proposal to the larger developer body as a General Resolution. _Note:_
Ah, ok, but it's certainly not clear that a "formal objection" (an
ill-defined term, IMO) is the same thing as "calling for a hold". And
I didn't see *anyone* make a motion to send the proposal to GR.
But lets not correct this, I think some vagueness is good in general.
If we get to formal and start worrying about points of order, we're
just going to make matters worse, IMO.
--
Chris Waters [EMAIL PROTECTED] | I have a truly elegant proof of the
or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | above, but it is too long to fit into
http://www.dsp.net/xtifr | this .signature file.
