On Sat, Aug 07, 1999 at 07:57:38PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > > > * If so, what syntax should we use? > > > - My choice would be the "package (>= 42 i386)" syntax, > > > as it's the least intrusive choice. > > > > allright. But allow a seperator between version number and arch, like > > "(>= 42, i386)" that's a bit easier on the mind. > > What happens if you want an architecture specifier but not a version > specifier?
What's exactly wrong with "(i386)" or "(i386 alpha)" and so on? Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org finger brinkmd@ Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org master.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] for public PGP Key http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
