> Raul> (a) documenting existing practice, and > Raul> (b) getting approval from relevant package developers, and > Raul> (c) getting the technical committee to approve (or disapprove) a > Raul> completed proposal, and > Raul> (d) getting the developers as a whole to overturn a technical committee > Raul> decision.
On Sun, Sep 05, 1999 at 03:48:09PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > If this is all this mailing list can do, I do not think that > the process is worth the effort, personally. Could you expand on this a bit? Reading the proposal document, I'm guessing that you're saying that point (a) is too narrow, or you're objecting to the idea that point (b) is important. [You can't be objecting to point c -- that's already in the proposal document. Though perhaps you have a different definition of "contentious" than I do. And given what little you've expressed here I don't think you're objecting to point (d).] -- Raul
