On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 04:08:36PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > Ok, this is taking up too much of my time. This was a straight forward > proposal, that saw no justified technical objections. If I have to argue > till I'm out of breath on the whim of anyone who sends an objection, then > this proposal can sit and die. > > This reminds me why I never get involved in policy. Too much politics to > let progress through. I'll just go back to developing, if policy decides > I'm no longer important...I'll still keep developing.
All of this aside, I just re-read the relevant policy: There's no *requirement* that you use -g -- it's recommended, but not required. [It is required that you strip the binaries, but if I recall correctly that's because strip had benefit even on binaries compiled without -g.] So you can go ahead and compile without -g if that's important to you. -- Raul
