On 12-Sep-99, 20:05 (CDT), "Juergen A. Erhard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Though I'd rather have it read like > > Because '/usr/local' and its contents are for exclusive use of the > local administrator, a package must not rely on the presence or > absence of files or directories in '/usr/local' for normal > operation, although files present in there may modify or enhance > the behavior of the package. > > I removed the "absence of"... the absence of directories in /usr/local > (even those that a package installed) must *not* have any bearing on > the function or behavior of that package.
Well, if the presence of a directory (and files) affect the function, then the lack of them also affects it -- but that's nitpicking, and I think your version is probably clearer. Looks good to me. Steve -- Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read every list I post to.)
