On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 02:22:20PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > That is, that the only consideration about whether a package should be > added to main, contrib or non-free be its licensing terms. > > Packages that are `too buggy to support' or `fail to meet policy > requirements in a serious way' should either be fixed (ideally), or not > included in Debian at all.
Or moved to project/experimental. This is a second => -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <Knghtbrd> Europe Passes Pro-spam Law <Knghtbrd> I though only Americans were that fucking stupid => <Espy> apparently americans are quite naive :)
pgpawwNLM1cf5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
