On Thu, 28 Oct 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Joel Klecker wrote: > > > At 14:42 +0200 1999-10-27, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > I doubt gcc works without ldso ;-) > > > > Sure it does, it's not a libc5 executable. > > Ooops! I forgot that libc6 uses its own dynamic linker. > Why is ldso still essential, then?
Mmm, surely because it provides ldconfig... [ This is not my day ]. -- "b79d9a87c4c26149c3b25f444ff5055b" (a truly random sig)
