On Thu, Oct 28, 1999 at 04:26:50PM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> severity 39830 normal
> retitle 39830 [AMENDMENT 28/10/1999] get rid of undocumented(7) symlinks
> thanks
> 
> I proposed to change the "Manual pages" section of our policy to get
> rid of the undocumented(7) symlinks.
> 
> This proposal was seconded by Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Chris
> Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, so I change the status to
> "amendment" now.
> 
> Here's a new version of my proposal, where I merged in the ideas which
> were introduced in the discussion:
> 
> -------------------------- schnipp -----------------------------------
> --- policy-3.0.1.1.sgml       Wed Oct 27 13:52:33 1999
> +++ policy.sgml       Thu Oct 28 16:13:29 1999
> @@ -3025,21 +3025,21 @@
>         page'.</p>
>         
>       <p>
> -       If no manual page is available for a particular program,
> -       utility or function and this is reported as a bug on
> -       debian-bugs, a symbolic link from the requested manual page
> -       to the <manref name="undocumented" section="7"> manual page
> -       should be provided.  This symbolic link can be created from
> -       <tt>debian/rules</tt> like this:
> -       <example>
> -         ln -s ../man7/undocumented.7.gz \
> -         debian/tmp/usr/share/man/man[1-9]/the_requested_manpage.[1-9].gz
> -       </example> 
> -       This manpage claims that the lack of a manpage has been
> -       reported as a bug, so you may only do this if it really has
> -       (you can report it yourself, if you like).  Do not close the
> -       bug report until a proper manpage is available.</p>
> -       
> +       There must be a manual page at least for every program.  If
> +       no manual page is available, this is considered as a bug and
> +       should be reported to the bug tracking system (the
> +       maintainer of the package is allowed to do write this bug
I would suspect that this is a typo:   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> +       report himself, too).  Do not close the bug report until a
> +       proper manpage is available<footnote>It is not very hard to
> +       write a man page, see the <url
> +       id="http://www.schweikhardt.net/man_page_howto.html";
> +       name="Man-Page-HOWTO">, <tt>man(7)</tt>, or the examples
> +       created by <tt>debmake</tt> or <tt>dh_make</tt></footnote>.
> +       To avoid duplicate bug reports about missing manual pages,
> +       you should inform the user, that you know about the missing
> +       manual page in
> +       <tt>/usr/share/doc/<var>package</var>/TODO.Debian</tt>.</p>
> +
>       <p>
>         You may forward a complaint about a missing manpage to the
>         upstream authors, and mark the bug as forwarded in the
> -------------------------- schnipp -----------------------------------
> 
> Background:
> ===========
> Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> described the problem of the
> undocumented(7) symlinks in debian-policy:
> 
> > The symlink causes a stupid manpage to show up saying that there is no
> > manpage. I would prefer if man would simply say there is no manpage.  
> > 
> > The fact that there is already a bug filed is evident from the BTS. Why
> > put a symlink to undocumented into the package?
> > 
> > Sometimes I check for documentation by doing a dpkg -L. I see a manpage
> > for a certain command and do a "man xxx". Result is a "undocumented"   
> > manpage. Very irritating. It would have saved some effort if there simply
> > were no manpage.
> 
> Ciao
> 
>         Roland
> 
> -- 
>  * [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.spinnaker.de/ *
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-- 
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>           <><  *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster          *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  *
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   *
=========================================================================

Attachment: pgpVRGIBZX9t9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to