> [in one message] > Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Personally, I think that hard-coding into a DFSG package a reference > > to some non-DFSG package is rather grotesque. I'm disappointed that > > we disagree on this issue. > > [in another message] > Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 12:19:57AM -0800, Chris Waters wrote: > > The other objection I've seen is, basically, "the purity of the system > > is marred by the very presence of even the *names* of non-free > > packages." My opinion of this notion is unprintable. :-) > > I can't think of anything to add to that. Except to comment that it > might be rather difficult to document samba if you could never refer > to non-free software. :-) You're suggesting you don't recognize the difference between package structure and documentation? -- Raul
