On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 07:58:33PM -0800, Bruce Perens wrote: > One can argue that some advertising requirements fail DFSG #6. I went > through this with the Zope license draft (they fixed it). First, it > discriminates against commercial-free web sites, and then if many people > had the same requirement it would create a constraint on use because a > site would have to carry hundreds of badges. > > The DFSG and its more general flavor the OSD have won tremendous mind-share. > I would never have believed they would be this successful. > There are hundreds of things we could justifyably add to the DFSG/OSD, > but I don't think most of them would really improve it. We run the risk of > "breaking the magic" by making the document less comprehensible to the > average person, and less stable in their perception.
We have to clearly state : is it allowed or not Many people (including me) arent sure And we should scan thru the whole main system if there arent some licences with advertise-forcing term
