Hi. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, at Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 06:25:33 -0800, on Subject: Re: base dependency warning, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's also current policy. I tacked it on only for reference. I'm not > accepting amendments that change that paragrpah, because I am only changing > a prt of policy to document existing practice, but you're quite welcome to > make your own proposal. I see. > (It's odd -- in my last two proposals, I have quoted a little scrap of > context, and people have been keen to change that. Perhaps more people > should be reading policy and seeing what they think needs to be changed in > it.) We found that paragraph should be changed, so after your proposal will be passed, some one should make new proposal, I think. I second your change on "a part of policy to document existing prctice". If I can, I will make my proposal to change the last paragraph, with the help and advice from other people. I think it helps the work for boot-floppies, and I wish to do the work for boot-floppies, though I do not have enough skill and time to do development of it. Thanks. -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
