Previously Matthew Vernon wrote: > I think also the principle of only rejecting uploads with RC bugs in > is important (ignoring the flamefests elsewhere about whether or not > you think maintainers should spend their lives dotting all the is and > t's or producing slightly buggy packages with whatever time they have) > - if it's not RC, then the package would be releasable, so has > contributed in a positive manner to Debian, so should not be rejected.
In the case of adns the way it is packaged would be reason enough to file a release-critical bug on it, as you have been told in the latest rejection message. The fact that there is no release critical bug at the moment is only because it hasn't been accepted in the distribution yet. Wichert. -- ________________________________________________________________ / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
pgptCq3K58j14.pgp
Description: PGP signature
