Chris Waters wrote: > I'd rather see 'em judged on a case-by-case basis than have 200 > mechanically generated reports sent out blind.
Did i ever say I was going to send out automated bug reports? > Although I do suspect that a careful inspection of package > descriptions would result in well more than 200 cases where a bug > report would be appropriate...the problem is by no means just limited > to dups. Terse and uninformative descriptions are all-too-common. > But finding them all is not something a script can really do. So since I cannot fix everything perfectly, I should not even try. I see. -- see shy jo
