On 27 Mar 2000, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > This is my take on the subject. An user should not need to > know about /usr/share/doc; mentioning it, espescially with the > wording that implies that one needs look into both dirs to be sure, > is exactly the kind of user interface lossage we were trying to > avoid. > > /usr/doc symlinks are in place for human backward > compatibility, but, more importantly, to assure that all docs are > found under one location, namely, /usr/doc/ for potato, and > /usr/share/doc in woody. In either release, we should be able to > just look into one location for the copyright files.
Ok, I agree with this analysis. Will mention /usr/doc only again in /etc/motd. Thanks. -- "b96fac4159e6fdd759b417fbf08e9a88" (a truly random sig)
