On 02-May-00, 01:40 (CDT), Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [w.r.t. preserving the names of upstream changelogs] > The default would become -k if something about preserving names was > added to policy. > > I don't think the name always has to be preserved, it seems that in some > cases there would be no benefit from doing so. As I said at the top of > this messages, there are circumstances where it adds value.. but I don't > see any proof that it _always_ adds value.
There are probably cases where there is no benefit, but is it likely there are any where it's a *bad* thing to do? If not, then changing the default behaviour of dh_installchangelogs to '-k' would be a reasonable thing to do. I don't actually feel strongly about this, but I would like to make having two copies of the changelog a bug... Steve
