Your message dated Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:54:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#45406: [PROPOSAL] Config files must have manpages
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 1999 07:08:17 +0000
Received: (qmail 12506 invoked from network); 18 Sep 1999 07:08:15 -0000
Received: from postino2.prima.com.ar (200.42.0.133)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 18 Sep 1999 07:08:15 -0000
Received: from newton (host026007.ciudad.com.ar [200.42.26.7])
by postino2.prima.com.ar (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA10115
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 04:08:09 -0300 (ART)
Received: from nick by newton with local (Exim 3.03 #1 (Debian GNU/Linux))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 11SEdu-0001Zl-00; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 04:10:42 -0300
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 04:10:42 -0300
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_Lichtmaier?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Config files must have manpages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i
Package: debian-policy
Severity: wishlist
Version: 3.0.1.1
Most configuration files have manpages, but not all. It would be useful
if every config file (intended to be edited) would be forced to be
documented in a manpage.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 45406-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2000 23:56:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 19 18:56:19 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mserv1a.u-net.net [195.102.240.34]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 134BOt-0006yZ-00; Mon, 19 Jun 2000 18:56:19 -0500
Received: from [195.102.197.183] (helo=polya)
by mserv1a.u-net.net with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #63)
id 134BPM-0005ZI-00; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:56:48 +0100
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 134BN7-0007o0-00; Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:54:29 +0100
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 00:54:29 +0100
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Email Bug Control <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#45406: [PROPOSAL] Config files must have manpages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 45406 [REJECTED] Config files must have manpages
thanks
This proposal never received enough support and received objections.
The proposer of the modified wording also wrote:
Note that my wording hasn't been approved 100% by the proposer and
other seconder - frankly, I'm having second thoughts about it,
considering the amount of files which would need to get a manpage...
seems rather pointless.
So I'm closing the proposal.
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
