On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 01:01:58AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I have been trying to get this mail out all this week, and > somehow it never seems to show up on the mailing list. I apologize if > this shows in duplicate. > > I have been over the discussion in the list, and here is my > encapsulation of the consensus that developed here (I did exercise my > judgement in a couple of cases, including toning down the new > requirement for all configuration files needing manual pages -- I > would support a proposal that that be so, but it should not be a part > of this proposal). > > As Josip asked, this is a word diff wrt the recently uploaded > policy package. > > Comments appreciated.
(wdiff delted)
By the looks of things this mail isn't getting distributed via the -policy
list because it's too big. It did make it into the BTS though, so you should
be able to get the full message at:
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=64437&msg=51
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
-- Dave Clark
pgp3tpvpBk5p3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
