On 20000925T152912+0200, Roman Hodek wrote: > A patch to dpkg-buildpackage is sufficient, as the daemons just call > dpkg-buildpackage -B.
Ok. > Does it make sense to allow one 'build-*' target without the other? If > a package can utilize the separation, it needs both anyway. In extreme > cases, one of the targets still can be empty. But requiring both makes > it easier to test for them. You're right. I'm too tired to fix the diff now, and I'm going away for the weekend. Anybody willing to fix the diff for me? :-) > But besides this, I support this proposal. Is that a second? -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
