John Galt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is it? What does Debian have to do with EvilCorp that Red Hat or > Slackware doesn't? Why is Debian getting singled out? Why haven't I seen > the same thing on the FreeBSD lists? It looks as if RMS's goal it to make > Debian his own private whipping boys again, just like the crusade about > non-free being too easily available.
What makes you think that Debian is being singled out? I don't have any knowledge about what RMS may have written to their leader, do you? I don't think FreeBSD brings up the issue, because they don't distribute any packages of binaries in the way Debian or RedHat do IIUC. Thomas
