>>"Ben" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> PROPOSAL:
Ben> With the integration of the "testing" distribution, we will not (in my
Ben> understanding) ever upload to frozen. Our uploads will generally go to
Ben> unstable, and propogate to "testing" based on some rules (bugs, time,
Ben> etc..).
Could you please explain why testing shan't be frozen to allow
for QA and an extended pre-release test process? If I understand it,
packages are automatically moved from unstable to testing based on
some static, automated rules -- and satic, automated processes do not
catch all problems (if they did, we would not need debuggers).
I still envisage the need for a frozen distribution --
something that is not a moving target, and something that can be put
through its paces
The only difference I see is that we shall not wait endlessly
for RC bugs to be resolved
manoj
--
Our OS who art in CPU, UNIX be thy name. Thy programs run, thy
syscalls done, In kernel as it is in user!
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
