On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:19:02AM +1100, Brian May wrote: > I thought the Changelog was used to record changes in the package.
Something has changed: the fact that the bug is not present has been documented (in the changelog itself). I don't insist on this interpretation, but it doesn't seem unreasonable. After all, we do require a changelog entry, even if the *source* hasn't changed. If changelog entries only covered source changes, I might agree, but then we'd have to record the current version number elsewhere. (And then that "elsewhere" might be an appropriate place for mentioning non-bugs or previously-fixed bugs.) -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
