On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 04:18:55AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 07:04:53PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > Certainly, having split packages would make it *easier* to cope with this, > > and that's a good reason to make it policy, but it's not enough of a reason > > to remove dosemu from the distribution. IMO. > Why would dosemu need to be removed from the distribution?
Because that's what violating a "must" directive *means*. It's the sole difference between "should" and "must": either's a bug, but if it's a "must" the package gets dropped. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgpzZcTA1DvBD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
