-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Branden Robinson) wrote: >--- policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001 >+++ policy.sgml.x-support Sun Mar 25 01:55:07 2001 >@@ -5946,14 +5946,15 @@ > <heading>Programs for the X Window System</heading> > > <p> >- <em>Programs that may be configured with support for the X Window >+ <em>Programs that can be configured with support for the X Window > System</em> must be configured to do so and must declare any > package dependencies necessary to satisfy their runtime >- requirements when using the X Window System, unless the package >- in question is of standard or higher priority, in which case >- X-specific binaries may be split into a separate package, or >- alternative versions of the package with X support may be >- provided. >+ requirements when using the X Window System. If such a package >+ is of higher priority than the X packages on which it depends, it >+ is required that either the X-specific components be split into a >+ separate package; an alternative version of the package, which >+ includes X support, be provided; or the package's priority be >+ lowered. > </p>
Thank you, the wording in the current policy seems to imply that providing alternate frontends is an option only open to higher-priority packages, whereas this is much clearer. Seconded. - -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE6vlGVMVrRHkkXpRQRAunLAJ9+mvnddsm/za0CIQ2s0g3dt5285gCgvN/W nLBt+Lp68cP3LLFK+n0ozmQ= =MCBE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
