On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:22:54AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > --- policy.sgml Sun Mar 25 01:34:33 2001 > +++ policy.sgml.x-terminal-emulator Sun Mar 25 02:17:56 2001 > @@ -5976,13 +5976,31 @@ > > <p> > <em>Packages that provide a terminal emulator</em> for the X > - Window System which support a terminal type with a terminfo > - description provided in the <tt>ncurses-base</tt> package > - should declare in their control data that they provide the > - virtual package <tt>x-terminal-emulator</tt>. They should > - also register themselves as an alternative for > - <tt>/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator</tt>, with a priority of > - 20. > + Window System which meet the criteria listed below should declare > + in their control data that they provide the virtual package > + <tt>x-terminal-emulator</tt>. They should also register > + themselves as an alternative for > + <tt>/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator</tt>, with a priority of 20. > + </p> > + > + <p>To be an <tt>x-terminal-emulator</tt>, a program must: > + <list> > + <item>Be able to emulate a DEC VT100 terminal, or a compatible > + terminal.<item>
are there testing utilities available such that one could check that something is in fact 'vt100 compatible' ? -- Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org LPSG "member" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.lpsg.org -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
