On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 07:09:03PM +1000, Edward C. Lang wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 06:57:19PM -0500, Thomas Smith wrote: > > How about: > > > > The location of all installed files and directories must be compatible with > > the > > Linux Filesystem Heirarchy Standard (FHS), and should be compliant with it, > > except as noted. Locations should not comply with the FHS where a > > violation is > > mandated by Debian policy, or would be impractical or unreasonable. > > I don't particularly like the last part of that sentance. Unless it is > mandated by D-policy, it should comply, right? I don't believe there should be > a case that isn't in either policy.
That's a good point. I guess that, since compliance is a `should', there's an implicit "unless it's unreasonable." How about: "The location of all installed files and directories must be compatible with the Linux Filesystem Heirarchy Standard (FHS), and should be compliant with it, except where a violation is mandated by Debian policy." -- Thomas Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://finbar.dyndns.org/ gpg key id 1024D/ACABA81E, fingerprint: 3A47 CFA5 0E5D CF4A 5B22 12D3 FF1B 84FE ACAB A81E
pgpm9K1TCcf1f.pgp
Description: PGP signature
