Julian Gilbey wrote: > Apologies; I think I was on another planet when I did that. You are > of course totally right both about protocol and content. Reverting > that change. I'm going to write: > > It may either be a <tt>conffile</tt> or a configuration > file maintained by the package maintainer scripts. See > <ref id="config files"> for more details.
No problem, I'm just glad aj caught it while the issue is fresh in our minds. The fix looks fine. -- see shy jo
