On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:08:08PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Given that policy is supposed to be mostly frozen (barring bug > fixes) [...]
I don't have any advice to offer on the docbook conversion (except "yay"), but I would like to call the policy editors' attention to #98291, which is intended to be a bug fix. (Note that the final draft, which won approval, is near the bottom of the bug report.) This is a trivial, -2+3 line patch which resolves an apparent self-contradiction in policy. It was actually in progress when the freeze was announced, and if I'd known a freeze was in the works, I would have tried a little harder to beat the deadline, but as it is, I still think it's both small enough and bug-fixish enough to go in now. It may be a bit of a borderline case whether or not this really qualifies as a bug fix, but it doesn't actually change policy, merely clarifies it, which I would consider to be an important distinction if I were a policy editor. Since I'm not, I'll leave the final judgement up to the policy editors, but I just want to make sure they're aware of this one. cheers -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku
