Anthony Towns <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:10:27AM +0100, Edward Betts wrote: > > # 2.3.3. The description of a package > > # ----------------------------------- > > # Copyright statements and > > # other administrivia should not be included either (that is what the > > # copyright file is for). > > The description for lsh-utils begins: > > Description: A Secure Shell v2 (SSH2) protocol implementation -- server > > lsh is GNU GPL'd implementation of the Secure Shell > > protocol version 2 (SSH2). The SSH (Secure SHell) protocol > > is a secure replacement for rlogin, rsh and rcp. > > A copyright statement looks like: > > ``Copyright (c) 2001 Anthony Towns'' > > If the license is particularly relevant to the package (as in the case of > ssh v lsh v ssh-nonfree), it's appropriate for the description.
Thanks for the clarification. -- Don't worry -- shop.
