On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Tille, Andreas wrote: > Well, I´m not familiear with policy decisions. However if I´m not > completely wrong the MPL seems to be what I would call a *common > license* if I look at several projects releasing under it. That´s > why I expected that we would have more packages which are released > under MPL. > > I have no personal feelings about it and if you think this is no > reason to include it in the common licenses dir feel free to close > this bug.
Furthermore, the "GPL should be included in any package under GPL anyway because of distribution of .deb on non-Debian systems" debate should have shown that putting a license in common-licenses is a bad idea. -- Jean-Christophe Dubacq -- ATER en informatique à la faculté d'Orsay. Tel: 01 69 15 76 43 / 06 64 86 10 56 --- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
