On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 10:16:09AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > And, why should the severity only be useful for the release manager, and > released architectures?
Think about it for a while from any perspective but a hurd hacker's for heavens sake. Think about what should get the highest priority right now, a hurd release in a few years or an i386 release in a few weeks. Think about the usual effects of uploads to fix hurd specific bugs (which is to say: breakage everywhere else). Think about how much time I can possibly devote to your whims about the BTS considering the various other things I can devote my time too. Think about whether anyone else at all can or will do anything about them. Think about the sort of ratio of effort that's reasonable to put into doing things versus justifying why they're done this way. Think about whether there's any real practical benefit to insisting on someone else doing things the way you want, rather than you just hacking around the problem yourself and getting stuff done. _Think about things_ godammit. Cheers, aj, who wishes he'd remember that he'd given up on transparency already -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]